Skin compatibility of cyclodextrins and their derivatives: a comparative assessment using a corneoxenometry bioassay

Few studies have been performed to assess the risk of skin damage by cyclodextrins (CD) and they have yielded contradictory results. The present study was conducted using the corneoxenometry bioassay on human stratum corneum to compare the skin compatibility of CD currently used in pharmaceutical pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 479 - 482
Main Authors Piel, G., Moutard, S., Uhoda, E., Pilard, F., Piérard, G.E., Perly, B., Delattre, L., Evrard, B.
Format Journal Article Web Resource
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.05.2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Few studies have been performed to assess the risk of skin damage by cyclodextrins (CD) and they have yielded contradictory results. The present study was conducted using the corneoxenometry bioassay on human stratum corneum to compare the skin compatibility of CD currently used in pharmaceutical preparations (βCD, γCD, Rameb, Dimeb, Trimeb, HP-βCD and HP-γCD) and that of new amphiphilic CD derivatives, namely, the phospholipidyl-CD (DMPE-Dimeb and DMPE-Trimeb). All the tested CD were well tolerated by the stratum corneum at a concentration of 5%. However, inter-individual reactivity was larger for DMPE-Dimeb, suggesting a more aggressive trend for this compound. Cutaneous Index of Mildness values obtained confirm that Dimeb is able to extract some skin components and shows that DMPE-Dimeb performs similarly.
Bibliography:scopus-id:2-s2.0-1842861703
ISSN:0939-6411
1873-3441
1873-3441
DOI:10.1016/j.ejpb.2003.12.004