Critical Evaluation of Gene Expression Changes in Human Tissues in Response to Supplementation with Dietary Bioactive Compounds: Moving Towards Better-Quality Studies

• Published in: Nutrients Vol. 10; no. 7; p. 807
• Main Authors: Pokimica, Biljana, García-Conesa, María-Teresa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 22.06.2018; MDPI
• Subjects: bioactive compounds; Biological Availability; Cell Line; clinical trials; dietary nutrient sources; Dietary Supplements; experimental design; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Targeting; genes; guidelines; Humans; mechanism of action; Phytochemicals - administration & dosage; Phytochemicals - pharmacokinetics; quantitative polymerase chain reaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; Review; Tissue Distribution; tissues; transcription (genetics); mRNA levels; plant food bioactives; RT-qPCR; human tissues; interindividual variability; health effects
• ISSN: 2072-6643; 2072-6643
• DOI: 10.3390/nu10070807

Pre-clinical cell and animal nutrigenomic studies have long suggested the modulation of the transcription of multiple gene targets in cells and tissues as a potential molecular mechanism of action underlying the beneficial effects attributed to plant-derived bioactive compounds. To try to demonstrate these molecular effects in humans, a considerable number of clinical trials have now explored the changes in the expression levels of selected genes in various human cell and tissue samples following intervention with different dietary sources of bioactive compounds. In this review, we have compiled a total of 75 human studies exploring gene expression changes using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). We have critically appraised the study design and methodology used as well as the gene expression results reported. We herein pinpoint some of the main drawbacks and gaps in the experimental strategies applied, as well as the high interindividual variability of the results and the limited evidence supporting some of the investigated genes as potential responsive targets. We reinforce the need to apply normalized procedures and follow well-established methodological guidelines in future studies in order to achieve improved and reliable results that would allow for more relevant and biologically meaningful results.