Critical analysis of antibacterial agents in clinical development

The antibacterial agents currently in clinical development are predominantly derivatives of well-established antibiotic classes and were selected to address the class-specific resistance mechanisms and determinants that were known at the time of their discovery. Many of these agents aim to target th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature reviews. Microbiology Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 286 - 298
Main Authors Theuretzbacher, Ursula, Bush, Karen, Harbarth, Stephan, Paul, Mical, Rex, John H, Tacconelli, Evelina, Thwaites, Guy E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Nature Publishing Group 01.05.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The antibacterial agents currently in clinical development are predominantly derivatives of well-established antibiotic classes and were selected to address the class-specific resistance mechanisms and determinants that were known at the time of their discovery. Many of these agents aim to target the antibiotic-resistant priority pathogens listed by the WHO, including Gram-negative bacteria in the critical priority category, such as carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and Enterobacterales. Although some current compounds in the pipeline have exhibited increased susceptibility rates in surveillance studies that depend on geography, pre-existing cross-resistance both within and across antibacterial classes limits the activity of many of the new agents against the most extensively drug-resistant (XDR) and pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative pathogens. In particular, cross-resistance to unrelated classes may occur by co-selection of resistant strains, thus leading to the rapid emergence and subsequent spread of resistance. There is a continued need for innovation and new-class antibacterial agents in order to provide effective therapeutic options against infections specifically caused by XDR and PDR Gram-negative bacteria.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1740-1526
1740-1534
DOI:10.1038/s41579-020-0340-0