Phase 2 randomized controlled trial of intravenous or intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus mFOLFOX6 vs. mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Objective We conducted a phase 2 trial to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous paclitaxel or intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus mFOLFOX6 vs. mFOLFOX6 in untreated advanced gastric cancer. Methods Participants with untreated advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to: intravenou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 12; p. 850242
Main Authors Zhao, Shen, Su, Liyu, Chen, Yigui, Li, Xiaofeng, Lin, Peicheng, Chen, Wujin, Fang, Wenzheng, Zhu, Jinfeng, Li, Hui, Ren, Liping, Liu, Jie, Hong, Yanni, Lin, Shaowei, Fan, Nanfeng, Lin, Rongbo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 07.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective We conducted a phase 2 trial to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous paclitaxel or intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus mFOLFOX6 vs. mFOLFOX6 in untreated advanced gastric cancer. Methods Participants with untreated advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to: intravenous paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 or intraperitoneal paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 plus mFOLFOX6 omitting bolus fluorouracil; or mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 , leucovorin 400 mg/m 2 , fluorouracil 400 mg/m 2 bolus, fluorouracil 2,400 mg/m 2 46-h continuous infusion). Treatment was every 14 days for up to 9 cycles followed by S-1 maintenance. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Results Of 90 enrolled participants, 30 in the intravenous paclitaxel group, 29 in the intraperitoneal paclitaxel group, and 30 in the mFOLFOX6 group were included in the analyses. The median progression-free survival was 6.52, 5.83, and 4.55 months, respectively, for the intravenous paclitaxel group, intraperitoneal paclitaxel group, and mFOLFOX6 group. The hazard ratios were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.33–0.94; p = 0.026) and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.33–0.96; p = 0.037), respectively, for the intravenous paclitaxel group and the intraperitoneal paclitaxel group vs. the mFOLFOX6 group. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events for the intravenous paclitaxel group, intraperitoneal paclitaxel group, and mFOLFOX6 group, respectively, were neutropenia (30.0%, 34.5%, 33.3%), diarrhea (13.3%, 20.7%, 13.3%), and leukopenia (10.0%, 13.8%, 10.0%). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusion The findings of this phase 2 trial suggest that adding intravenous paclitaxel or intraperitoneal paclitaxel to mFOLFOX6 for untreated advanced gastric cancer improved progression-free survival with manageable adverse events.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Edited by: Hiroki Tanabe, Asahikawa Medical University, Japan
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Reviewed by: Takahiro Kogawa, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Japan; Haiping Jiang, Zhejiang University, China
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.850242