Comparative Study of Stout Beer Batch Fermentation Using Free and Microencapsulated Yeasts
Because many questions arise regarding the use of immobilization technology to consistently produce a high quality beer, this work focuses on the effects of using an immobilization matrix in the fermentation process. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and potential uses of immobili...
Saved in:
Published in | Food and bioprocess technology Vol. 5; no. 2; pp. 750 - 758 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer-Verlag
01.02.2012
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Because many questions arise regarding the use of immobilization technology to consistently produce a high quality beer, this work focuses on the effects of using an immobilization matrix in the fermentation process. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and potential uses of immobilization on sensorial characteristics such as color, flavor, and headspace compounds of stout beer, when using batch fermentation. Batch production of beer was conducted as a standard ale process for stout beer production. For the immobilized yeasts fermentation, cells were microencapsulated in alginate, by using the Thiele modulus procedure for microcapsule design. Glucose concentration, cell multiplication, cell viability, specific gravity, pH, Brix, and ethanol were monitored throughout the fermentation process. Both, sensorial analysis (statistic triangle tests) and instrumental methods (gas chromatography to measure headspace compounds and visible spectrophotometer to quantify the color) were used to evaluate characteristics of the beer that was produced from immobilized and free yeast fermentations. Free and immobilized yeasts fermentation showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) for all variables of interest. The profile of headspace compounds was different, perhaps because of changes in yeast’s behavior and the presence of secondary metabolites. However, immobilization did not have a significant impact on the beer flavor, as detected by the sensorial triangle test. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0379-4 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1935-5130 1935-5149 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11947-010-0379-4 |