Cone-beam CT measurements of distal tibio-fibular syndesmosis in asymptomatic uninjured ankles: does weight-bearing matter?

Objective To evaluate the influence of weight-bearing (WB) load in standard axial ankle syndesmotic measurements using cone beam CT (CBCT) examination of asymptomatic uninjured ankles. Materials and methods In this IRB approved, prospective study, patients with previous unilateral ankle fractures we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSkeletal radiology Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 583 - 594
Main Authors Shakoor, Delaram, Osgood, Greg M., Brehler, Michael, Zbijewski, Wojciech B., de Cesar Netto, Cesar, Shafiq, Babar, Orapin, Jakrapong, Thawait, Gaurav K., Shon, Lew C., Demehri, Shadpour
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.04.2019
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To evaluate the influence of weight-bearing (WB) load in standard axial ankle syndesmotic measurements using cone beam CT (CBCT) examination of asymptomatic uninjured ankles. Materials and methods In this IRB approved, prospective study, patients with previous unilateral ankle fractures were recruited. We simultaneously scanned the injured ankles and asymptomatic contralateral ankles of 27 patients in both WB and NWB modes. For this study, only asymptomatic contralateral ankles with normal plain radiographs were included. Twelve standardized syndesmosis measurements at two axial planes (10 mm above the tibial plafond and 5 mm below the talar dome) were obtained by two expert readers using a custom CBCT viewer with the capability for geometric measurements between user-identified anatomical landmarks. Inter-reader reliability between two readers was obtained using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We compared the WB and NWB measurements using paired t test. Results Significant agreement was observed between two readers for both WB and NWB measurements ( p <0.05). ICC values for WB and NWB measurements had a range of 50–95 and 31–71 respectively. Mean values of the medial clear space on WB images (1.75, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.6, 1.9) were significantly lower than on NWB images (2.05, 95% CI: 1.8, 2.2) measurements ( p <0.001). There was no significant difference between the remaining WB and NWB measurements. Conclusion Measurements obtained from WB images are reliable. Except for the medial clear space, no significant difference in syndesmotic measurements were observed during the WB mode of CBCT acquisition, implying that the tibio-fibular relationship remains unchanged when the physiological axial weight-bearing load is applied.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-2348
1432-2161
DOI:10.1007/s00256-018-3074-6