A 26-week inhalation toxicity study with formaldehyde in the monkey, rat, and hamster

This inhalation study involved simultaneous exposure of five groups of 6 male Cynomolgus monkeys, 20 male and 20 female Fischer 344 rats, and 10 male and 10 female Syrian golden hamsters for 22 hr per day, 7 days per week for 26 weeks to formaldehyde gas. The cumulative mean exposure concentrations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inToxicology and applied pharmacology Vol. 68; no. 3; p. 329
Main Authors Rusch, G M, Clary, J J, Rinehart, W E, Bolte, H F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1983
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This inhalation study involved simultaneous exposure of five groups of 6 male Cynomolgus monkeys, 20 male and 20 female Fischer 344 rats, and 10 male and 10 female Syrian golden hamsters for 22 hr per day, 7 days per week for 26 weeks to formaldehyde gas. The cumulative mean exposure concentrations were 0, 0, 0.19, 0.98, and 2.95 ppm for the two control groups, low-, mid-, and high-level exposure groups, respectively. There was no treatment-related mortality during the study. In monkeys, the most significant findings were hoarseness and congestion and squamous cell metaplasia in the nasal turbinates of the 2.95-ppm exposure group. There were no signs of toxicity in the lower-level exposure groups. In the rat, the only observations of possible responses to exposure were found in the 2.95-ppm exposure group. These findings consisted of squamous metaplasia in the nasal turbinates, decreased body weights starting during the second week of the study, and decreased liver weights. In contrast to monkeys and rats, hamsters did not show any significant responses to exposure even at 2.95 ppm. It was concluded that nearly continuous exposure of monkeys and rats for six months at a level of 2.95 ppm of formaldehyde clearly elicited an effect while exposures below this level did not appear to demonstrate an effect. It further appeared that the monkey and rat were more sensitive to formaldehyde exposure than the hamster.
ISSN:0041-008X
DOI:10.1016/0041-008X(83)90276-4