Strategies Towards Capturing Nitrogenase Substrates and Intermediates via Controlled Alteration of Electron Fluxes

• Published in: Chemistry : a European journal Vol. 25; no. 10; pp. 2389 - 2395
• Main Authors: Hiller, Caleb J., Lee, Chi Chung, Stiebritz, Martin T., Rettberg, Lee A., Hu, Yilin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 18.02.2019
• Subjects: artificial electron donor; Azotobacter; Biomimetics; Catalysis; Chemical reactions; Chemistry; Commodities; Electron density; Fischer-Tropsch process; Intermediates; Nitrogenase; Organic chemistry; Reductase; Reduction; Substrates; Sulfur; reductase; catalysis; CO; artificial electron donor; nitrogenase
• ISSN: 0947-6539; 1521-3765
• DOI: 10.1002/chem.201803735

Nitrogenase utilizes an ATP‐dependent reductase to deliver electrons to its catalytic component to enable two important reactions: the reduction of N2 to NH4+, and the reduction of CO to hydrocarbons. The two nitrogenase‐based reactions parallel the industrial Haber–Bosch and Fischer–Tropsch processes, yet they occur under ambient conditions. As such, understanding the enzymatic mechanism of nitrogenase is crucial for the future development of biomimetic strategies for energy‐efficient production of valuable chemical commodities. Mechanistic investigations of nitrogenase has long been hampered by the difficulty to trap substrates and intermediates relevant to the nitrogenase reactions. Recently, we have successfully captured CO on the Azotobacter vinelandii V‐nitrogenase via two approaches that alter the electron fluxes in a controlled manner: one approach utilizes an artificial electron donor to trap CO on the catalytic component of V‐nitrogenase in the resting state; whereas the other employs a mismatched reductase component to reduce the electron flux through the system and consequently accumulate CO on the catalytic component of V‐nitrogenase. Here we summarize the major outcome of these recent studies, which not only clarified the catalytic relevance of the one‐CO (lo‐CO) and multi‐CO (hi‐CO) bound states of nitrogenase, but also pointed to a potential competition between N2 and CO for binding to the same pair of reactive Fe sites across the sulfur belt of the cofactor. Together, these results highlight the utility of these strategies in poising the cofactor at a well‐defined state for substrate‐ or intermediate‐trapping via controlled alteration of electron fluxes, which could prove beneficial for further elucidation of the mechanistic details of nitrogenase‐catalyzed reactions. Two strategies have been used to capture CO on V‐nitrogenase as a substrate via controlled alteration of electron fluxes: one employs an artificial electron donor to uncouple CO binding from its subsequent reduction; whereas the other utilizes a mismatched reductase component to reduce the electron flux and “backs up” CO on the enzyme. Both strategies enable generation of a substrate‐bound state at a well‐defined state of the cofactor.