Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles

Visual representations are essential for communicating ideas in the science classroom; however, the design of such representations is not always beneficial for learners. This paper presents instructional design considerations providing empirical evidence and integrating theoretical concepts related...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience education (Salem, Mass.) Vol. 90; no. 6; pp. 1073 - 1091
Main Author Cook, Michelle Patrick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.11.2006
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Visual representations are essential for communicating ideas in the science classroom; however, the design of such representations is not always beneficial for learners. This paper presents instructional design considerations providing empirical evidence and integrating theoretical concepts related to cognitive load. Learners have a limited working memory, and instructional representations should be designed with the goal of reducing unnecessary cognitive load. However, cognitive architecture alone is not the only factor to be considered; individual differences, especially prior knowledge, are critical in determining what impact a visual representation will have on learners' cognitive structures and processes. Prior knowledge can determine the ease with which learners can perceive and interpret visual representations in working memory. Although a long tradition of research has compared experts and novices, more research is necessary to fully explore the expert–novice continuum and maximize the potential of visual representations. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 90:1073–1091, 2006
Bibliography:istex:7F49F948B48F40182F246FA80873CD4D430CDF5D
ArticleID:SCE20164
ark:/67375/WNG-RMDDCKXW-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ISSN:0036-8326
1098-237X
DOI:10.1002/sce.20164