Electrostatic field and ion temperature drop in thin current sheets: A theory

The observational evidence presented by Liang et al. (2009) showed that a neutral sheet–pointing electrostatic field frequently arises in the late growth‐phase current sheet in the magnetotail. In this paper, we elaborate on the suggestion that this electric field is associated with the thinning of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Geophysical Research. B. Solid Earth Vol. 115; no. A3
Main Authors Liu, W. W., Liang, J., Donovan, E. F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 10.03.2010
American Geophysical Union
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The observational evidence presented by Liang et al. (2009) showed that a neutral sheet–pointing electrostatic field frequently arises in the late growth‐phase current sheet in the magnetotail. In this paper, we elaborate on the suggestion that this electric field is associated with the thinning of the current sheet to the ion scale at which the electron and ion current sheets begin to separate. The attendant effect of a decreasing ion temperature, also interpreted in terms of a thinning current sheet, suggests that a cold plasma population is involved. We review existing theories of “charged” Harris sheet that can produce electrostatic fields and show that they cannot explain the observations for various reasons. A particular problem is the over shielding of the electrostatic field by the cold population embedding the current sheet. We argue that this problem stems from not treating the cold plasma as a separate population from the hot plasma forming the thin current sheet (TCS). We show that if the cold population is treated as external to the TCS and behaving in a largely MHD manner, the resultant solution yields an electrostatic field and ion temperature drop consistent with the observations.
Bibliography:istex:EE63D68B8ECEDE93B14A064DDEBF9737BC85479F
ark:/67375/WNG-P2LB4QRZ-2
ArticleID:2009JA014359
This is a commentary on DOI
10.1029/2009JA014357
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0148-0227
2169-9380
2156-2202
2169-9402
DOI:10.1029/2009JA014359