Standing‐type magnetically guided capsule endoscopy versus gastroscopy for gastric examination: multicenter blinded comparative trial

• Published in: Digestive endoscopy Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 557 - 564
• Main Authors: Lai, Hua‐sheng, Wang, Xin‐ke, Cai, Jian‐qun, Zhao, Xin‐mei, Han, Ze‐long, Zhang, Jie, Chen, Zhen‐yu, Lin, Zhi‐zhao, Zhou, Ping‐hong, Hu, Bing, Li, Ai‐min, Liu, Si‐de
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia John Wiley and Sons Inc 01.05.2020
• Subjects: Adult; Capsule Endoscopes; Capsule Endoscopy - instrumentation; compliance rate; conventional gastroscopy; Feasibility Studies; Female; gastric disease; gastric examination; Gastroscopy; Humans; Magnetics; Male; Original; Patient Preference; Single-Blind Method; standing‐type magnetically guided capsule; Stomach Diseases - diagnosis; gastric disease; conventional gastroscopy; gastric examination; compliance rate; standing-type magnetically guided capsule
• ISSN: 0915-5635; 1443-1661
• DOI: 10.1111/den.13520

Aim To compare feasibility and safety after gastrointestinal checkup by standing‐type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (SMCE) and conventional gastroscopy. Methods This was a prospective multicenter, blinded study that compared SMCE with gastroscopy in patients from April 2018 to July 2018. All patients first underwent SMCE and then subsequently had gastroscopy with i.v. anesthesia. We calculated the compliance rates of gastric lesion detection by SMCE using gastroscopy as the standard. Capsule retention rate, incidence of adverse events, and patient satisfaction were documented throughout the study. Results One hundred and sixty‐one patients who completed SMCE and gastroscopy were included in the analysis. Positive compliance rate among SMCE and gastroscopy was 92.0% (95% CI: 80.77%–97.78%). Negative compliance rate was 95.5% (89.80%, 98.52%). Moreover, overall compliance rate was 94.41% (89.65%, 97.41%). Sixty‐four pathological outcomes were identified. Of these 64 outcomes, 50 were detected by both procedures. The gastroscopy method neglected seven findings (such as five erosions, one polyp, and one ulcer). Furthermore, SMCE also overlooked seven lesions (i.e. one erosion, two polyps, one atrophy, and three submucosal tumors). Capsule retention or related adverse events were not reported. Conclusion Standing‐type magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy provides equivalent agreement with gastroscopy and may be useful for screening of gastric illnesses without any anesthesia.