A Mixed Methods Assessment of Home-Based Video Pretransplant Lung Education

Introduction: Patients awaiting lung transplantation must learn new information to successfully navigate the transplant process. A supplemental video series was piloted to patients at home during the Covid-19 pandemic to improve pre-transplant education. Methods: A mixed methods study was undertaken...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProgress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 261 - 265
Main Authors Mansell, Holly, Fenton, Mark E., Tam, Julian S., Rosaasen, Nicola, Cardinal, Louise, Nelson, Nicole
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: Patients awaiting lung transplantation must learn new information to successfully navigate the transplant process. A supplemental video series was piloted to patients at home during the Covid-19 pandemic to improve pre-transplant education. Methods: A mixed methods study was undertaken to assess patient experiences with this method of education, confirm the ideal timing of the education, and identify gaps that require further attention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 one-on-one or dyadic (patients and caregivers) who viewed the video series at home. A third-party researcher (not involved in creation of the educational materials) conducted the interviews by phone, which were audio recorded and then transcribed verbatim. NVivo 12 Pro for Windows software was used to code the data and identify emerging themes. Results: Participants indicated that home-based videos were applicable, and informative and helpful (4.7 on 5-point Likert scale) and appreciated the advice and experiences of real patients. They were satisfied with their transplant education (4.2/5). While there were few aspects that the participants disliked about the videos, the interviews elicited outstanding questions about the transplant process (eg, logistical aspects of travel) and transplant concerns (eg, medications, expenses, and precautions in daily life). Conclusion: Patients being assessed or listed for lung transplant valued the novel electronic video education, and we will implement the home-based process into standard of care after the patient's initial visit with the transplant respirologist. Pre-transplant education will be tailored to help address the outstanding gaps identified in this program evaluation.
ISSN:1526-9248
2164-6708
DOI:10.1177/15269248221107048