Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies

• Published in: Waste management (Elmsford) Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 185 - 195
• Main Authors: Mills, N., Pearce, P., Farrow, J., Thorpe, R.B., Kirkby, N.F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2014; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Biofuels; Economics; Energy recovery technologies; Energy-Generating Resources - economics; Exact sciences and technology; Hot Temperature; Hydrolysis; LCA; Methane; Other industrial wastes. Sewage sludge; Other wastes and particular components of wastes; Pollution; Sewage; Sewage sludge; United Kingdom; Waste Disposal, Fluid - economics; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods; Wastes; United Kingdom; Europe; Economics; Energy recovery technologies; LCA; Sewage sludge; Hydrolysis; Methane; Pyrolysis; Life cycle (environment); Environment impact; Energy recovery; Biogas; Anaerobic digestion
• ISSN: 0956-053X; 1879-2456
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.024

•Five sludge to energy configurations were compared environmentally and economically.•Advanced AD (THP) has advantages over conventional AD.•CHP is environmentally superior to bio-methane injection in the UK.•The UK financial incentives support bio-methane and advanced energy recovery.•Drying post AD creates very attractive energy recovery solutions. The UK Water Industry currently generates approximately 800GWh pa of electrical energy from sewage sludge. Traditionally energy recovery from sewage sludge features Anaerobic Digestion (AD) with biogas utilisation in combined heat and power (CHP) systems. However, the industry is evolving and a number of developments that extract more energy from sludge are either being implemented or are nearing full scale demonstration. This study compared five technology configurations: 1 – conventional AD with CHP, 2 – Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) AD with CHP, 3 – THP AD with bio-methane grid injection, 4 – THP AD with CHP followed by drying of digested sludge for solid fuel production, 5 – THP AD followed by drying, pyrolysis of the digested sludge and use of the both the biogas and the pyrolysis gas in a CHP. The economic and environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) found that both the post AD drying options performed well but the option used to create a solid fuel to displace coal (configuration 4) was the most sustainable solution economically and environmentally, closely followed by the pyrolysis configuration (5). Application of THP improves the financial and environmental performance compared with conventional AD. Producing bio-methane for grid injection (configuration 3) is attractive financially but has the worst environmental impact of all the scenarios, suggesting that the current UK financial incentive policy for bio-methane is not driving best environmental practice. It is clear that new and improving processes and technologies are enabling significant opportunities for further energy recovery from sludge; LCA provides tools for determining the best overall options for particular situations and allows innovation resources and investment to be focused accordingly.