Comparison of laparoscopic and traditional abomasal cannulation in sheep

Introduction: The objective of this study was to describe a laparoscopic abomasal cannulation (LAC) technique, and compare the extent of the surgical trauma after LAC and open abomasal cannulation (OAC) by examining postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and serum values of interleukin-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of veterinary research Vol. 60; no. 1; pp. 113 - 117
Main Authors Zhang, Shixia, Hao, Manliang, Ma, Yuzhong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Pulawy De Gruyter Open 01.03.2016
De Gruyter Poland
Sciendo
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: The objective of this study was to describe a laparoscopic abomasal cannulation (LAC) technique, and compare the extent of the surgical trauma after LAC and open abomasal cannulation (OAC) by examining postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and serum values of interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α in sheep. Material and Methods: Twelve healthy ewes, weighing 38-43 kg, were used. Three-portal laparoscopic techniques were used for LAC procedures. OAC was performed by a right flank laparotomy. Results: Abomasal cannulation was accomplished in all sheep without major intraoperative and postoperative complications. The abomasal contents were collected easily in both groups. Comparative studies found that open procedures exhibit a more pronounced short-term increase in cytokines and significantly higher VAS pain scores than the corresponding laparoscopic procedures. Conclusion: The laparoscopic technique proved to be less traumatic than the conventional open technique.
ISSN:2450-8608
2450-7393
2450-8608
DOI:10.1515/jvetres-2016-0016