Analysis of some available heat transfer coefficients applicable to solar chimney power plant collectors

• Published in: Solar energy Vol. 83; no. 2; pp. 264 - 275
• Main Authors: dos Santos Bernardes, Marco Aurélio, Von Backström, Theodor W, Kröger, G Detlev
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2009; Elsevier; Pergamon Press Inc
• Subjects: Analysis; Applied sciences; Energy; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid mechanics; Heat transfer; Natural energy; Power plants; Solar chimney; Solar energy; Solar thermal conversion; Solar thermal power plants; Solar chimney; Fluid mechanics; Heat transfer; Electric power plant; Turbine; Solar chimneys; Heat transfer coefficient; Solar tower; Roof; Ground surface; Air temperature; Thermal analysis; Performance
• ISSN: 0038-092X; 1471-1257
• DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2008.07.019

A solar chimney power plant consists of a translucent collector which heats the air near the ground and guides it into the base of a chimney at its centre. The buoyant air rises in the chimney and electricity is generated through one or more turbines in or near the base of the chimney. Various studies about solar chimney power plant performance have been published. Different calculation approaches with a variety of considerations have been applied to calculate chimney power plant performance. In particular, two comprehensive studies are relevant, namely those of (Bernardes, M.A.d. S., Voß, A., Weinrebe, G., 2003. Thermal and technical analyses of solar chimneys. Solar Energy 75, 511–524; Pretorius, J.P., Kröger, D.G., 2006b. Solar chimney power plant performance. Transactions of the ASME 128, 302–311). The paper compares the methods used to calculate the heat fluxes in the collector, and their effects on solar chimney performance. Reasons for the discrepancies between the predictions of the two models are given. In general the Pretorius model produces higher heat transfer coefficients and higher heat rate fluxes for both the roof and for the ground surfaces. The two approaches lead to very similar air temperature rises in the collector and thus, similar produced power.