Antioxidant defence in UV-irradiated tobacco leaves is centred on hydrogen-peroxide neutralization
Greenhouse grown tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana) plants were exposed to supplemental UV centred at 318 nm and corresponding to 13.6 kJ m−2 d−1 biologically effective UV-B (280–315 nm) radiation. After 6 days this treatment decreased photosynthesis by 30%. Leaves responded by a large...
Saved in:
Published in | Plant physiology and biochemistry Vol. 82; pp. 239 - 243 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Paris
Elsevier Masson SAS
01.09.2014
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Greenhouse grown tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Petit Havana) plants were exposed to supplemental UV centred at 318 nm and corresponding to 13.6 kJ m−2 d−1 biologically effective UV-B (280–315 nm) radiation. After 6 days this treatment decreased photosynthesis by 30%. Leaves responded by a large increase in UV-absorbing pigment content and antioxidant capacities. UV-stimulated defence against ROS was strongest in chloroplasts, since activities of plastid enzymes FeSOD and APX had larger relative increases than other, non-plastid specific SODs or peroxidases. In addition, non-enzymatic defence against hydroxyl radicals was doubled in UV treated leaves as compared to controls. In UV treated leaves, the extent of activation of ROS neutralizing capacities followed a peroxidases > hydroxyl-radical neutralization > SOD order. These results suggest that highly effective hydrogen peroxide neutralization is the focal point of surviving UV-inducible oxidative stress and argue against a direct signalling role of hydrogen peroxide in maintaining adaptation to UV, at least in laboratory experiments.
•Supplemental UV decreased photosynthesis by 30% and activated antioxidant defence.•Defence against ROS focussed on H2O2 (peroxidases, especially APX).•Chloroplast antioxidants APX and Fe-SOD were activated more than other pathways.•Under low PAR/UV conditions acclimation to UV may not rely on H2O2 signals. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0981-9428 1873-2690 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.06.011 |