Epileptiform discharge detection with the 4-channel frontal electroencephalography during post-resuscitation care

Abstract Introduction We performed this study to investigate whether the SEDline system, a 4-channel-processed electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring device in the frontal area, can detect epileptiform discharges accurately during post-resuscitation care in comatose cardiac arrest survivors. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inResuscitation Vol. 117; pp. 8 - 13
Main Authors You, Kyoung Min, MD, Suh, Gil Joon, MD, PhD, Kwon, Woon Yong, MD, PhD, Kim, Kyung Su, MD, PhD, Ko, Sang-Bae, MD, PhD, Park, Min Ji, MD, Kim, Taegyun, MD, Ko, Jung-In, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.08.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Introduction We performed this study to investigate whether the SEDline system, a 4-channel-processed electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring device in the frontal area, can detect epileptiform discharges accurately during post-resuscitation care in comatose cardiac arrest survivors. Methods Adult comatose cardiac arrest survivors, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for post-resuscitation care including TTM, were enrolled. Within 72 h post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), conventional EEG was conducted for 30 minutes. The SEDline system data were recorded with a video camera simultaneously with conventional EEG. Data retrieved from conventional EEG were interpreted by a neurologist and data from the SEDline system were interpreted by three emergency physicians blinded to the conventional EEG data. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the SEDline system to detect epileptiform discharges were calculated. Results Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Epileptiform discharges were confirmed in 6 patients (15.4%) who had the same patterns of generalized periodic epileptiform discharges in both conventional EEG and the concurrent SEDline system. The SEDline system showed 100.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), 54.1%-100.0%) of sensitivity, 100.0% (95% CI, 89.4%-100.0%) of specificity, 100.0% (95% CI, 54.1%-100.0%) of PPV, and 100.0% (95% CI, 89.4%-100.0%) of NPV. The overall classification accuracy of the SEDline system to detect epileptiform discharges was 100.0%. Conclusion The SEDline system detected epileptiform discharges accurately in comatose cardiac arrest survivors during post-resuscitation care.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.016