Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap

Angiosperms are by far the most species-rich clade of land plants, but their origin and early evolutionary history remain poorly understood. We reconstructed angiosperm phylogeny based on 80 genes from 2,881 plastid genomes representing 85% of extant families and all orders. With a well-resolved pla...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature plants Vol. 5; no. 5; pp. 461 - 470
Main Authors Li, Hong-Tao, Yi, Ting-Shuang, Gao, Lian-Ming, Ma, Peng-Fei, Zhang, Ting, Yang, Jun-Bo, Gitzendanner, Matthew A., Fritsch, Peter W., Cai, Jie, Luo, Yang, Wang, Hong, van der Bank, Michelle, Zhang, Shu-Dong, Wang, Qing-Feng, Wang, Jian, Zhang, Zhi-Rong, Fu, Chao-Nan, Yang, Jing, Hollingsworth, Peter M., Chase, Mark W., Soltis, Douglas E., Soltis, Pamela S., Li, De-Zhu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.05.2019
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Angiosperms are by far the most species-rich clade of land plants, but their origin and early evolutionary history remain poorly understood. We reconstructed angiosperm phylogeny based on 80 genes from 2,881 plastid genomes representing 85% of extant families and all orders. With a well-resolved plastid tree and 62 fossil calibrations, we dated the origin of the crown angiosperms to the Upper Triassic, with major angiosperm radiations occurring in the Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous. This estimated crown age is substantially earlier than that of unequivocal angiosperm fossils, and the difference is here termed the ‘Jurassic angiosperm gap’. Our time-calibrated plastid phylogenomic tree provides a highly relevant framework for future comparative studies of flowering plant evolution. A study reconstructed angiosperm phylogeny on the basis of plastome data representing 2,351 angiosperm and 187 gymnosperm species, and dated the origin of crown angiosperms to be significantly earlier than the estimates based on fossil data.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2055-0278
2055-0278
DOI:10.1038/s41477-019-0421-0