Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years

• Published in: Clinical oral investigations Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 1165 - 1172
• Main Authors: Lohbauer, Ulrich, Reich, Sven
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2017; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Crowns; Dental Restoration Wear; Dentistry; Germany; Humans; Materials Testing; Medicine; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; Original Article; Surface Properties; Zirconium - chemistry; Antagonist wear; Ceramic crown; Monolithic zirconia; Enamel wear
• ISSN: 1432-6981; 1436-3771; 1436-3771
• DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of wear on the antagonist occlusal surfaces of clinically placed monolithic zirconia premolar and molar crowns (LAVA Plus, 3M ESPE). Materials and methods Fourteen in situ monolithic zirconia crowns and their opposing antagonists ( n  = 26) are the subject of an ongoing clinical trial and have been clinically examined at baseline and after 24 months. Silicone impressions were taken and epoxy replicas produced for qualitative SEM analysis and quantitative analysis using optical profilometry. Based on the baseline replicas, the follow-up situation has been scanned and digitally matched with the initial topography in order to calculate the mean volume loss (in mm 3 ) as well as the mean maximum vertical loss (in mm) after 2 years in service. Results The mean volume loss for enamel antagonist contacts ( n  = 7) was measured to 0.361 mm 3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.204 mm. The mean volume loss for pure ceramic contacts ( n  = 10) was measured to 0.333 mm 3 and the mean of the maximum vertical loss to 0.145 mm. The wear rates on enamel contacts were not significantly different from those measured on ceramic antagonists. Conclusions Based on the limitations of this study, it can be concluded for the monolithic zirconia material LAVA Plus that the measured wear rates are in consensus with other in vivo studies on ceramic restorations. Further, that no significant difference was found between natural enamel antagonists and ceramic restorations as antagonists. The monolithic zirconia restorations do not seem to be affected by wear within the first 2 years. Clinical relevance The monolithic zirconia crowns (LAVA Plus) show acceptable antagonist wear rates after 2 years in situ, regardless of natural enamel or ceramics as antagonist materials.