empirical analysis of the impact of EU's new food safety standards on china's tea export

Stricter pesticide residue standards have severe negative impacts on the trade in developing countries, leading to a considerable decrease in the export of food and agricultural products from developing countries. For example, officials of the EU Health and Consumer Protection Bureau published the n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of food science & technology Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 745 - 750
Main Authors Yue, Ning, Kuang, Hua, Sun, Lin, Wu, Linhai, Xu, Chuanlai
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2010
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Stricter pesticide residue standards have severe negative impacts on the trade in developing countries, leading to a considerable decrease in the export of food and agricultural products from developing countries. For example, officials of the EU Health and Consumer Protection Bureau published the new EU Act 2000/42/EC on 30 June 30, 2000. This act amended the maximum residue levels (MRLs) for some pesticides. From 1 July 1, 2001 onwards, the EU implemented new 134 MRLs for pesticides in tea products. This measure above will limit market entry opportunities and will lead to a decrease in exports from these developing countries. This study aimed to utilise the Gravity Model in international trade, to empirically analyse the impact of the new EU Food Safety Act on the major tea exporters of the world. It is shown that the new EU Food Safety Act has had a significant impact on the major tea exporters of the world as shown in the decline in export volume. Quantitative analysis indicates that tea export has reduced by 61.6% following the MRL reduction to 5% significance level. In recent years the Chinese tea traded to EU supported the accuracy of this conclusion. Practically, China's tea exported to the EU did not drop fast as the theoretical result shows.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02189.x
ArticleID:IJFS2189
istex:395A73A721B8F6B2EE66E84B57581D02F72837C5
ark:/67375/WNG-SHRWCKML-R
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-5423
1365-2621
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02189.x