Toxicity of free proline revealed in an Arabidopsis T-DNA-tagged mutant deficient in proline dehydrogenase

The toxicity of proline (Pro) to plant growth has raised questions despite its protective functions in response to environmental stresses. To evaluate Pro toxicity, we isolated an Arabidopsis T-DNA-tagged mutant, pdh, that had a defect in Pro dehydrogenase (AtProDH), which catalyzes the first step o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant and cell physiology Vol. 44; no. 5; pp. 541 - 548
Main Authors Nanjo, T. (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Tsukuba, Ibaraki (Japan). Tsukuba Inst.), Fujita, M, Seki, M, Kato, T, Tabata, S, Shinozaki, K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Oxford University Press 01.05.2003
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The toxicity of proline (Pro) to plant growth has raised questions despite its protective functions in response to environmental stresses. To evaluate Pro toxicity, we isolated an Arabidopsis T-DNA-tagged mutant, pdh, that had a defect in Pro dehydrogenase (AtProDH), which catalyzes the first step of Pro catabolism. The pdh mutant showed hypersensitivity to exogenous application of <= 10 mM L-Pro, at which wild-type plants grew normally. A dose-dependent increase in internal free Pro accumulation was observed in pdh plants during external Pro supply. These results do not just prove the toxicity of Pro, but also suggest that AtProDH is the only enzyme acting as a functional ProDH in Arabidopsis. To further analyze the targets of Pro toxicity, we compared the expression of thousands of genes by pdh plants with that by wild-type plants by cDNA microarray analysis. Most genes were unaffected. Here we demonstrate Pro toxicity by using the pdh mutant and discuss a cause-and-effect action between an excess of free Pro and growth inhibition in Arabidopsis.
Bibliography:2004003472
F60
istex:7FAE417D48EEE601C904DEDE6E54D743965EF70C
local:pcg066
Received January 20, 2003; Accepted March 13, 2003
ark:/67375/HXZ-KD4VQ53S-4
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0032-0781
1471-9053
DOI:10.1093/pcp/pcg066