Marking-to-market government guarantees to financial systems – Theory and evidence for Europe

• Published in: Journal of international money and finance Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 990 - 1007
• Main Authors: Baglioni, Angelo, Cherubini, Umberto
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2013; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Bailouts; Bank bail out; Banking; Banking industry; Default; Economic conditions; Economic crisis; Economic forecasts; Experimental methods; Financial crisis; Financial services; Germany; Government budget; Ireland; Liability; Netherlands; Risk premiums; Studies; Systemic risk; United Kingdom; Western Europe; Europe; Systemic risk; H63; Government budget; Bank bail out; G21; Financial crisis
• ISSN: 0261-5606; 1873-0639
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2012.08.004

We propose a new index for measuring the systemic risk of default of the banking sector, which is based on a homogeneous version of multivariate intensity based models (Cuadras–Augé distribution). We compute the index for 10 European countries, exploiting the information incorporated in the CDS premia of 44 large banks over the period January 2007–September 2010. In this way, we provide a market based measure of the liability incurred by the Governments, due to the implicit bail-out guarantees they provide to the financial sector. We find that during the financial crisis the systemic component of the default risk in the banking sector has significantly increased in all countries, with the exception of Germany and the Netherlands. As a consequence, the Governments' liability implicit in the bail out guarantee amounts to a quite relevant share of GDP in several countries: it is huge for Ireland, lower but still important for the other PIIGS (Italy is the least affected within this group) and for the UK. Finally, our estimate is very close to the overall amount of money already committed in the rescue plans adopted in Europe between October 2008 and March 2010, despite strong cross-country differences: in particular, Germany and Ireland seem to have committed an amount of resources much larger than needed; to the contrary, the Italian Government has committed much less than it should.