Binocular fusion/suppression to spatial frequency differences at the border of areas 17/18 of the cat
As shown by various human psychophysical studies, interocular spatial frequency disparities can yield a variety of percepts. In order to examine how binocular fusion is affected by spatial frequency differences, we have recorded cells in the border region of areas 17/18 of anesthetized cats. The opt...
Saved in:
Published in | Neuroscience Vol. 124; no. 1; pp. 121 - 136 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
2004
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | As shown by various human psychophysical studies, interocular spatial frequency disparities can yield a variety of percepts. In order to examine how binocular fusion is affected by spatial frequency differences, we have recorded cells in the border region of areas 17/18 of anesthetized cats. The optic axes of the eyes were deviated onto cathode-ray screens, and the optimal spatial frequency of each eye was assessed by monocular stimulations using drifting sinusoidal gratings. The optimal relative phase using identical spatial frequencies in both eyes was first determined. Spatial frequency differences were then introduced by keeping the optimal spatial frequency constant in one eye and varying the spatial frequency in the other. Results indicate that cells (39%) responded with an increased firing rate (facilitation) to similar spatial frequencies in each eye and with a gradual attenuation (occlusion or suppression) when spatial frequency differences were increased. However, binocular facilitation did not always occur to the presentation of identical stimuli. For 16% of the cells, maximal responses were observed when lower spatial frequencies than the optimal one were presented in one eye while higher spatial frequencies produced suppression. The opposite pattern was observed only for two cells. These findings are discussed in terms of binocular fusion and suppression. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0306-4522 1873-7544 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.10.035 |