Chronic unpredictable mild stress for modeling depression in rodents: Meta-analysis of model reliability

•Chronic unpredictable mild stress protocol represents a reliable model for modeling depression in rodents.•Difficulties in reproducing of stress protocol might be explained by modification of chronic unpredictable mild stress and sucrose preference protocols.•Numerous factors, such as the nature of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews Vol. 99; pp. 101 - 116
Main Authors Antoniuk, Svitlana, Bijata, Monika, Ponimaskin, Evgeni, Wlodarczyk, Jakub
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Chronic unpredictable mild stress protocol represents a reliable model for modeling depression in rodents.•Difficulties in reproducing of stress protocol might be explained by modification of chronic unpredictable mild stress and sucrose preference protocols.•Numerous factors, such as the nature of the stressor, housing conditions and features of the organism should be considered when employing chronic unpredictable mild stress model. Depression is currently among the top five leading causes of the global burden of disease. Chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) is currently the most commonly used, reliable, and effective rodent model of depression. However, for unclear reasons, this protocol is often difficult to reproduce in different laboratories. We performed a meta-analysis of studies that used the CUMS paradigm to evaluate depressive-like behavior in rodents. We sought to identify strain-dependent susceptibility to stress based on the development of one of the main end points of the model, “anhedonia.” The meta-analysis indicated that the CUMS protocol is a robust animal model of depression and is strongly associated with anhedonic behavior in rodents. However, high heterogeneity was found in the single subgroup analysis, which was attributable to modification of the CUMS and sucrose preference protocols. This may explain difficulties in reproducing stress protocols by different research groups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0149-7634
1873-7528
1873-7528
DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.002