Early versus late closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis

• Published in: Surgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 463 - 471
• Main Authors: Wang, Li, Chen, Xinling, Liao, Chen, Wu, Qian, Luo, Hongliang, Yi, Fengming, Wei, Yiping, Zhang, Wenxiong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 01.04.2021
• Subjects: Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Review Article; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Late closure; Temporary ileostomy; Rectal cancer; Early closure; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 0941-1291; 1436-2813
• DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02115-2

The complications caused by early closure (EC) or late closure (LC) after temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer patients have not been compared systematically. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the details surrounding this issue, based on a search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. The comparative indices included total complications, severe complications, and various individual complications before or after closure. Four randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), including the EASY trial, were analyzed, involving a collective total of 324 patients. EC tended to result in more postoperative complications than LC for rectal cancer patients with temporary ileostomy. This difference was mainly embodied in wound complications. Nevertheless, LC resulted in more complications than EC before closure, such as leakage outside the appliance bag and skin irritation. There was no obvious difference in severe postoperative complications or medical complications. With fewer overall and wound-related complications, LC tended to be more suitable than EC for rectal cancer patients with a temporary ileostomy; however, the complications before closure should also be considered.