Inflammatory bowel disease: An evaluation of health information on the internet

AIM To evaluate the quality and accuracy of websites written to the public on inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)(Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) and assess their readability level.METHODS Google?, Bing?, and Yahoo? search engines were searched independently by three researchers in December 2014...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 23; no. 9; pp. 1676 - 1696
Main Authors Azer, Samy A, AlOlayan, Thekra I, AlGhamdi, Malak A, AlSanea, Malak A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 07.03.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM To evaluate the quality and accuracy of websites written to the public on inflammatory bowel disease(IBD)(Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) and assess their readability level.METHODS Google?, Bing?, and Yahoo? search engines were searched independently by three researchers in December 2014. Only English-language websites were selected on the basis of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Researchers independently evaluated the quality of each website by using the DISCERN and the HONcode instruments. The readability levels were calculated using two formulas; the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index, and the Coleman-Liau Readability Index. The agreement between the evaluators was calculated using Cohen kappa coefficient.RESULTS Eighty-four websites were finally identified. Scores varied from a minimum DISCERN score of 18 to a maximum of 68 [mean ± SD, 42.2 ± 10.7; median = 41.5, interquartile range, interquartile range (IQR) = 15.8] and a minimum score of HONcode of 0.14 and a maximum of 0.95 (mean ± SD, 0.16 ± 0.19; median = 0.45, IQR = 0.29). Most of these websites were reviewed in 2014 and 2015 (n = 51). The creators of these websites were: universities and research centers(n = 25, 30%), foundations and associations (n = 15, 18%), commercial and pharmaceutical companies(n =25, 30%), charities and volunteer work(n = 9, 10%), and non-university educational bodies (n = 10, 12%). The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level readability score(mean ± SD) was 11.9 ± 2.4 and the Coleman-Liau Readability Index score was 12.6 ± 1.5. Significant correlation was found between the two readability scores (R2 = 0.509, P = 0.001). The overall agreement between evaluators measured by Cohen kappa coefficient was in the range of 0.804-0.876; rated as 'Good'.CONCLUSION The DISCERN and the HONcode scores of websites varied and the readability levels of most websites were above the public readability level. The study highlights the areas that need further improvement and development in patient education online materials about IBD.
Bibliography:Samy A Azer;Thekra I AlOlayan;Malak A AlGhamdi;Malak A AlSanea;Curriculum Development and Research Unit, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Telephone: +966-11-4699178 Fax: +966-11-4699174
Correspondence to: Dr. Samy A Azer, Professor, Curriculum Development and Research Unit, Medical Education Department, College of Medicine, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia. azer2000@optusnet.com.au
Author contributions: Azer SA participated in the study design and development and analysis and interpretation of data, construction of figures and tables and writing the manuscript; AlOlayan TI, AlGhamdi MA and AlSanea MA participated in the data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, construction of tables, and review of the manuscript.
Supported by the College of Medicine Research Center, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v23.i9.1676