Efficacy of Lactobacillus GG in prevention of nosocomial diarrhea in infants

Objective: Nosocomial diarrhea is a major problem in pediatric hospitals worldwide. We evaluated the efficacy of orally administered Lactobacillus GG (LGG) in the prevention of this disease in young children. Study design: Eighty-one children aged 1 to 36 months who were hospitalized for reasons oth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of pediatrics Vol. 138; no. 3; pp. 361 - 365
Main Authors Szajewska, Hanna, Kotowska, Maria, Mrukowicz, Jacek Z., Arma′nska, Malgorzata, Mikolajczyk, Wieslaw
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.03.2001
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Nosocomial diarrhea is a major problem in pediatric hospitals worldwide. We evaluated the efficacy of orally administered Lactobacillus GG (LGG) in the prevention of this disease in young children. Study design: Eighty-one children aged 1 to 36 months who were hospitalized for reasons other than diarrhea were enrolled in a double-blind trial and randomly assigned at admission to receive LGG (n = 45) at a dose of 6 × 109 colony-forming units or a comparable placebo (n = 36) twice daily orally for the duration of their hospital stay. Results: LGG reduced the risk of nosocomial diarrhea (≥3 loose or watery stools/24 h) in comparison with placebo (6.7% vs 33.3%; relative risk: 0.2; [95% CI: 0.06–0.6]; number needed to treat: 4 [95% CI: 2–10]). The prevalence of rotavirus infection was similar in LGG and placebo groups (20% vs 27.8%, respectively; relative risk: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.33–1.56). However, the use of LGG compared with placebo significantly reduced the risk of rotavirus gastroenteritis (1/45 [2.2%] vs 6/36 [16.7%], respectively; relative risk: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02–0.79; number needed to treat: 7; 95% CI: 3–40). Conclusions: Prophylactic use of LGG significantly reduced the risk of nosocomial diarrhea in infants, particularly nosocomial rotavirus gastroenteritis. (J Pediatr 2001;138:361-5)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3476
1097-6833
DOI:10.1067/mpd.2001.111321