Effectiveness of Bupivacaine Liposome Injectable Suspension for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled study

Abstract Background We compared the effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine to ropivacaine, each as part of multimodal pain management, in TKA postoperative pain control. Methods This prospective, double blind study randomized 96 TKA patients into a control group (periarticular injection of ropivacai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of arthroplasty Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. S268 - S271
Main Authors DeClaire, Jeffrey H., MD, Aiello, Paige M., MS, Warritay, Olayinka, MD, MPH, Freeman, D. Carl, Ph.D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background We compared the effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine to ropivacaine, each as part of multimodal pain management, in TKA postoperative pain control. Methods This prospective, double blind study randomized 96 TKA patients into a control group (periarticular injection of ropivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine in saline; 100cc) or an experimental group (periarticular injection of bupivacaine, ketorolac, morphine, and epinephrine in saline; 80cc plus 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine 20cc; total injection 100cc). The postoperative use of narcotics, Visual Analog Pain scores, hours to ambulate 100 feet, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups (control N=49, experiment N=47) in mean narcotic use per hour, total narcotic use during hospital stay, time to ambulate 100 feet, length of hospital stay, or Visual Analog Score for pain post-operatively. Conclusion There is no benefit in the use of liposomal bupivacaine compared to ropivacaine for postoperative pain control in TKA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.062