Growth and differentiation factors for periodontal regeneration: a review on factors with clinical testing
Stavropoulos A, Wikesjö UME. Growth and differentiation factors for periodontal regeneration: a review on factors with clinical testing. J Periodont Res 2012; 47: 545–553. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S Background and Objective: A large body of evidence implies that growth and differentiation fac...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of periodontal research Vol. 47; no. 5; pp. 545 - 553 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2012
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Stavropoulos A, Wikesjö UME. Growth and differentiation factors for periodontal regeneration: a review on factors with clinical testing. J Periodont Res 2012; 47: 545–553. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Background and Objective: A large body of evidence implies that growth and differentiation factors, based on their ability to regulate various functions of cells originating in the periodontal tissues, may support periodontal wound healing/regeneration, creating an environment conducive to and/or immediately inducing de novo tissue formation. This study presents a short systematic overview on growth and differentiation factor technologies evaluated in the clinic for their potential to enhance periodontal wound healing/regeneration.
Material and Methods: Reports on growth and differentiation factor technologies evaluated in the clinic for their potential to enhance periodontal wound healing/regeneration were selected for review.
Results: Growth and differentiation factor technologies intended for periodontal wound healing/regeneration and evaluated clinically included platelet‐derived growth factor, insulin‐like growth factor‐I and ‐II, basic fibroblast growth factor, bone morphogenetic protein‐3 and growth differentiation factor‐5; platelet‐derived growth factor was the only Food and Drug Administration‐approved commercially available growth and differentiation factor technology. In general, enhanced periodontal regeneration was observed in sites receiving growth and differentiation factors compared with control(s). However, improvements of relatively limited clinical magnitude have been shown thus far.
Conclusion: Although growth and differentiation factors project considerable appeal as candidate technologies in support of periodontal wound healing/regeneration, current candidate and commercially available technologies enhance treatment outcomes only to a limited extent in clinical settings. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:C8F4DF2770A0C31782F06DE2244A609AC45ADCD4 ark:/67375/WNG-DHKHX597-2 ArticleID:JRE1478 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0022-3484 1600-0765 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2012.01478.x |