Training for prescribing in-office and home phototherapy

Summary Background/Purpose One reason phototherapy use is lacking in the United States may be inadequate phototherapy education during dermatology training. The purpose of this study was to estimate the level of dermatology resident training with prescribing phototherapy and to see whether inadequat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhotodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 325 - 332
Main Authors Anderson, Kathryn L., Huang, Karen E., Huang, William W., Feldman, Steven R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background/Purpose One reason phototherapy use is lacking in the United States may be inadequate phototherapy education during dermatology training. The purpose of this study was to estimate the level of dermatology resident training with prescribing phototherapy and to see whether inadequate education may be contributing to the underuse of phototherapy in the United States. Methods A questionnaire was developed to assess resident education and comfort with prescribing phototherapy from the resident perspective. Botulinum toxin and radiation therapy training were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Responses were tabulated and comparisons made using Fisher's exact test and Cochran–Armitage trend test. Results A total of 88 residents responded. 42% and 81% of respondents reported not receiving didactic education on prescribing in‐office and home phototherapy, respectively, compared to 13% for botulinum toxin and 91% for radiation therapy. 29% and 76% reported not being comfortable prescribing in‐office and home phototherapy, respectively, compared to 36% for botulinum toxin and 91% for radiation therapy. Phototherapy education satisfaction was positively correlated with comfort of prescribing, and comfort prescribing was positively correlated with actual prescribing of phototherapy. Conclusions Training for prescribing phototherapy is lacking. Augmenting phototherapy training may help make home phototherapy more accessible for patients.
Bibliography:istex:1C335A66D69A93D8270EB84558B26624038AA191
ark:/67375/WNG-F9ZBZ8MC-Q
ArticleID:PHPP12195
Financial Support
There is no funding source for this article.
Conflict of Interest
The Center for Dermatology Research is supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Galderma Laboratories, L.P. Dr. Feldman is a consultant and speaker for Galderma, Stiefel/GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Labs, Warner Chilcott, Janssen, Amgen, Photomedex, Genentech, BiogenIdec, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr. Feldman has received grants from Galderma, Astellas, Abbott Labs, Warner Chilcott, Janssen, Amgen, Photomedex, Genentech, BiogenIdec, Coria/Valeant, Pharmaderm, Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Roche Dermatology, 3M, Bristol Myers Squibb, Stiefel/GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Medicis, Leo, HanAll Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Basilea, and Anacor and has received stock options from Photomedex. Dr. Feldman is the founder and holds stock in Causa Research. Dr. Huang is a consultant for XOMA. He has been a speaker for XOMA and Galderma. Kathryn L. Anderson and Karen E. Huang have no conflicts to disclose.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0905-4383
1600-0781
DOI:10.1111/phpp.12195