Variation in Kernel Hardness and Associated Traits in U.S. Barley Breeding Lines

Kernel hardness is an important trait influencing postharvest handling, processing, and food product quality in cereal grains. Though well-characterized in wheat, the basis of kernel hardness is still not completely understood in barley. Kernels of 959 barley breeding lines were evaluated for hardne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCereal chemistry Vol. 87; no. 5; pp. 461 - 466
Main Authors Nair, S, Ullrich, S.E, Blake, T.K, Cooper, B, Griffey, C.A, Hayes, P.M, Hole, D.J, Horsley, R.D, Obert, D.E, Smith, K.P, Muehlbauer, G.J, Baik, B.-K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published St. Paul, MN The American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc 01.09.2010
American Association of Cereal Chemists
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Kernel hardness is an important trait influencing postharvest handling, processing, and food product quality in cereal grains. Though well-characterized in wheat, the basis of kernel hardness is still not completely understood in barley. Kernels of 959 barley breeding lines were evaluated for hardness using the Single Kernel Characterization System (SKCS). Barley lines exhibited a broad range of hardness index (HI) values at 30.1-91.9. Distribution of kernel diameter and weight were 1.7-2.9 mm and 24.9-53.7 mg, respectively. The proportion of hull was 10.2-20.7%. From the 959 breeding lines, 10 hulled spring barley lines differing in HI values (30.1-91.2) were selected to study the associations of HI with proportion of hull, kernel weight, diameter, vitreousness, protein, β-glucan, and amylose content. Vitreousness, evaluated visually using a light box, showed a clear distinction between hard and soft kernels. Hard kernels appeared translucent, while soft kernels appeared opaque when illuminated from below on the light box. Kernel brightness (L*), determined as an indicator of kernel vitreousness, showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.83, P < 0.01) with HI. Protein, β-glucan, amylose content, proportion of hull, kernel weight, and diameter did not show any significant association with HI.
Bibliography:http://hdl.handle.net/10113/46597
ISSN:0009-0352
1943-3638
DOI:10.1094/CCHEM-12-09-0163