Systematics and evolutionary relationships of the mountain lizard Liolaemus monticola (Liolaemini): how morphological and molecular evidence contributes to reveal hidden species diversity

The delimitation of species is a major issue in systematic biology and has been a re-emerging discipline in the last decade. A number of studies have shown that the use of multiple data sets is critical for the identification of cryptic species, particularly in groups with complex evolutionary histo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological journal of the Linnean Society Vol. 96; no. 3; pp. 635 - 650
Main Authors TORRES-PÉREZ, FERNANDO, MÉNDEZ, MARCO A, BENAVIDES, EDGAR, MORENO, RODRIGO A, LAMBOROT, MADELEINE, PALMA, R. EDUARDO, ORTIZ, JUAN CARLOS
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2009
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The delimitation of species is a major issue in systematic biology and has been a re-emerging discipline in the last decade. A number of studies have shown that the use of multiple data sets is critical for the identification of cryptic species, particularly in groups with complex evolutionary histories. Liolaemus monticola is a montane lizard species distributed in central Chile (32°-42°S), with four described subspecies in a latitudinal gradient from north to south: L. m. monticola, L. m. chillanensis, L. monticola ssp. and L. m. villaricensis. In order to test the systematic status and phylogenetic relationships of the taxa included in the L. monticola group, we analysed morphological (morphometric and meristic) and molecular (allozyme and mitochondrial DNA) data sets. The results of the morphological analyses showed that meristic variables correctly assigned individuals with higher accuracy than did morphometric characters. The results of the analyses of allozyme data revealed eight diagnostic loci that are evidence for significant differences among the four L. monticola subspecies. Phylogenetic analyses with mitochondrial DNA data, including additional species, showed that the L. monticola group is polyphyletic. We postulate that the four current subspecies represent independent evolutionary lineages and must be raised to the specific level as L. monticola, L. chillanensis and L. villaricensis. The taxonomic status of the unnamed L. monticola ssp. remains unresolved, although we provide a preliminary proposal.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01140.x
istex:D5A7F1889BE950C29C0E9D2DEE329CB4B0596010
ArticleID:BIJ1140
ark:/67375/WNG-SVV8Q0S1-6
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01140.x