Looking beyond the state: transitional justice and the Kurdish issue in Turkey

Transitional justice has been promoted as an approach to peace through a strengthening of the democratic rule of law, including a recognition of the rights of victims and the promotion of trust in legal mechanisms, to deal with legacies of violence and repression. A main critique of the transitional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEthnic and racial studies Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 721 - 738
Main Author Jongerden, Joost
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Routledge 16.03.2018
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Subjects
Criticism
Democracy
Exclusion
Forced migration
History
Justice
Kurdish people
Kurds
Law
Leerstoelgroep Rurale sociologie
Migration
Oppression
Peace
Rehabilitation
Rights
Rule of law
Rural Sociology
Rurale Sociologie
self-administration
Transitional justice
Turkey
Victims
Violence
WASS
Turkey
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Transitional justice has been promoted as an approach to peace through a strengthening of the democratic rule of law, including a recognition of the rights of victims and the promotion of trust in legal mechanisms, to deal with legacies of violence and repression. A main critique of the transitional justice approach is that it leaves untouched the injustices underlying conflict and the structural causes of abuse. This article looks at ways in which the state in Turkey applied a transitional justice approach to the Kurdish issue, focusing on how it handled the legacy of forced migration and village evacuations from the 1990s. These state remedies to deal with forced migration ignored political dimensions and continued injustices. Against this context, it is argued that the concept of self-administration as it emerged in the course of the struggle of the Kurdish movement may be considered as a form of "do-it-yourself" transitional justice.
ISSN:0141-9870
1466-4356
DOI:10.1080/01419870.2017.1330486