A comparison of regular salmeterol vs ‘as required’ salbutamol therapy in asthmatic children

In a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel study, 426 asthmatic children aged 5–15 years old received salmeterol 50 μg b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d. via the Diskhaler™. All patients had access to inhaled salbutamol to be used on an ‘as required’ (p.r.n.) basis for symptomatic relief. The study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRespiratory medicine Vol. 92; no. 2; pp. 292 - 299
Main Authors Von Berg, A., de Blic, J., la Rosa, M., Kaad, P.-H., Moorat, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.02.1998
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel study, 426 asthmatic children aged 5–15 years old received salmeterol 50 μg b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d. via the Diskhaler™. All patients had access to inhaled salbutamol to be used on an ‘as required’ (p.r.n.) basis for symptomatic relief. The study design comprised a 2-week baseline, a 12-month treatment period incorporating a 2-week ‘off treatment’ after 6 months, and a 2-week follow-up period at the end of the trial. At the end of 12 months of treatment with salmeterol, the adjusted change from baseline for morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) was 56 and 471 min −1, respectively, and this was significantly greater than placebo ( P<0·01; P<0·05). Exacerbation rates did not differ between groups and results were not dependent upon concurrent inhaled steroid use. Neither treatment caused a change of ≥ 1 doubling dose in PC 20 PD 20 either during or on stopping treatment. Treatment with regular salmeterol 50 μg b.i.d. over a 12-month treatment period provides a significant, rapid and well-maintained improvement in lung function without increasing bronchial reactivity or asthma exacerbation rates compared to p.r.n. salbutamol.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/S0954-6111(98)90112-3