Update on the advances and challenges in bioequivalence testing methods for complex topical generic products

Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in pharmacology Vol. 15; p. 1330712
Main Authors Alomari, Nedaa, Alhussaini, Waleed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.02.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most of the government regulatory agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, demand that the generic complex topical products prove pharmaceutical and bioequivalence. The evaluation of bioequivalence for complex topical dermatological formulations is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of several factors. Although comparative clinical studies are still considered the gold standard approach for establishing bioequivalence in most formulations, these studies can be costly and insensitive to detect formulation differences. Therefore, significant efforts have been made to develop and validate alternative approaches that demonstrate bioequivalence and expedite the availability of high-quality generic topical dermatological products. This article reviews the current methods for determining the bioequivalence of topical formulations in humans, with particular emphasis on recent advances in these methodologies. Most of the alternative methods are sensitive and reproducible, with the capability to ease the financial burden of comparative clinical studies within a short delivery time. The limitations associated with each technique are reviewed in detail.
Bibliography:Joanna Jaworska, Procter & Gamble, United States
Reviewed by: Ryosuke Kuribayashi, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan
Edited by: Abad Khan, University of Swabi, Pakistan
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2024.1330712