Effects of online continuing medical education on perspectives of shared decision-making among Chinese endocrinologists

• Published in: BMC medical education Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 1 - 878
• Main Authors: Yang, Hongbo, Chen, Shi, Zhao, Nan, Zhou, Xiang, Cui, Lijia, Xia, Weibo, Li, Yuxiu, Zhu, Huijuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 17.11.2023; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Barriers; Check Lists; Clinical decision making; Clinical Diagnosis; Clinical Experience; Clinical medicine; Cohort analysis; Continued medical education; Continuing Education; Decision making; Doctoral Degrees; Endocrine disorders; Endocrinology; Hospitals; Likert Scales; Medical diagnosis; Medical education; Metabolism; National survey; National Surveys; Patients; Perspective; Physicians; Professional Continuing Education; Professional Training; Questionnaires; Scientific Research; Shared decision-making; State Surveys; Statistical Analysis; Technical Education; China
• ISSN: 1472-6920; 1472-6920
• DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04838-5

Abstract Background Shared decision-making (SDM) may influence the clinical outcomes of patients with endocrine disorders. There are few studies describing perspectives towards SDM among endocrinologists in China. Methods In the first stage, we conducted a national survey using an online questionnaire about SDM among endocrinologists in China. The national survey focused on attitude and propensity, potential barriers, and the effectiveness of SDM implementation strategies. In the second stage, survey participants were further recruited to participate in a prospective cohort study in the online continuing medical education (CME) program of Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing. The Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc) was employed to assess the effects of online CME on physicians’ perspectives during the process of SDM, which was conducted before and after the CME course was provided. Results In the national survey, 280 endocrinologists (75.7% female, mean age 38.0 ± 4.5 years, 62.5% with a duration of practice of more than ten years) completed the questionnaire. Participants had a generally positive attitude towards SDM in clinical practice. The main perceived barriers included time consumption, information inequality between doctors and patients, and a lack of technical support and training for SDM. The main uncertainties of implementation steps included inviting patients to participate in SDM (16.3%), assisting in decision-making (15.3%), facilitating deliberation and decision-making (13.7%), and providing information on benefits and risks (12.6%). Of the physicians who participated in the national survey, 84 registered for the eight-day online CME course. The SDM-Q-Doc score increased from 87.3 ± 18.2 at baseline to 93.0 ± 9.3 at the end of the 8-day online CME training (p = 0.003, paired t test). The participants’ age, sex, education level, practice duration, the annual number of patients with rare endocrine diseases, and the annual number of patients requiring MDT or CME were not significantly related to increased SDM-Q-Doc scores after online CME (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Chinese endocrinologists had a generally positive attitude towards SDM in clinical practice. There were also several uncertainties in the implementation steps of SDM. Regardless of a physician’s educational background or prior professional experience, CME may help to improve their perspectives regarding SDM.