Normal shoulder outcome score values in the young, active adult

Background Our objective was to determine baseline, normative values for multiple shoulder outcome scores in a young, active population without shoulder symptoms. Methods One hundred ninety-two volunteers completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 424 - 428
Main Authors Clarke, Michael G., LCDR, Dewing, Christopher B., LCDR, Schroder, David T., LCDR, Solomon, Daniel J., CDR, Provencher, Matthew T., LCDR
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Mosby, Inc 01.05.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Our objective was to determine baseline, normative values for multiple shoulder outcome scores in a young, active population without shoulder symptoms. Methods One hundred ninety-two volunteers completed the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, Simple Shoulder Test, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Their mean age was 28.8 years (range, 17-50 years). Results Of the participants, 59 (31%) scored no deficiencies on any of the outcome instruments, whereas 133 (69%) demonstrated some abnormal shoulder score. The mean scores were as follows: Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, 97.7 (SD, 5.2); modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 98.9 (SD, 3.3); Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index, 82.7 of 2100 (SD, 153.5); Simple Shoulder Test, 11.79 (SD, 0.60); and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 1.85 (SD, 5.99). Conclusion Our results show that the best possible shoulder score in an asymptomatic population may not be equivalent to a perfect score on the outcome scale.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2008.10.009