Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Does Not Improve Treatment Outcomes for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial

Purpose: To explore the efficacy of concomitant chemotherapy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and Materials: In this randomized phase 2 study [registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187238)], eligible patients with stage II (2010...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 10; p. 1314
Main Authors Huang, Xiaodong, Chen, Xiaozhong, Zhao, Chong, Wang, Jingbo, Wang, Kai, Wang, Lin, Miao, Jingjing, Cao, Caineng, Jin, Ting, Zhang, Ye, Qu, Yuan, Chen, Xuesong, Liu, Qingfeng, Zhang, Shiping, Zhang, Jianghu, Luo, Jingwei, Xiao, Jianping, Xu, Guozhen, Gao, Li, Yi, Junlin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frontiers Media S.A 07.08.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To explore the efficacy of concomitant chemotherapy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and Materials: In this randomized phase 2 study [registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187238)], eligible patients with stage II (2010 UICC/AJCC) NPC were randomly assigned to either IMRT alone (RT group) or IMRT combined with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m 2 , weekly) (CCRT group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The second endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and acute toxicities. Results: Between May 2010 to July 2012, 84 patients who met the criteria were randomized to the RT group ( n = 43) or the CCRT group ( n = 41). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The OS, LFFS, RFFS, DFS, and DMFS for the RT group and CCRT group were 100% vs. 94.0% ( p = 0.25), 93.0% vs. 89.3% ( p = 0.79), 97.7% vs. 95.1% ( p = 0.54), 90.4% vs. 86.6% ( p = 0.72), and 95.2% vs. 94.5% ( p = 0.77), respectively. A total of 14 patients experienced disease failure, 7 patients in each group. The incidence of grade 2 to 4 leukopenia was higher in the CCRT group ( p = 0.022). No significant differences in liver, renal, skin, or mucosal toxicity was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: For patients with stage II NPC, concomitant chemotherapy with IMRT did not improve survival or disease control but had a detrimental effect on bone marrow function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Nianyong Chen, Sichuan University, China; Liangfang Shen, Central South University, China
This article was submitted to Head and Neck Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Jun Ma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), China
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2020.01314