Feasibility and promise of community providers implementing home-based parent-child interaction therapy for families investigated for child abuse: A pilot randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Child abuse & neglect Vol. 117; p. 105063
• Main Authors: Villodas, Miguel T., Moses, Jacqueline O., Cromer, Kelly D., Mendez, Lucybel, Magariño, Loreen S., Villodas, Feion M., Bagner, Daniel M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2021; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Antisocial Behavior; Assignment; Caregiver burden; Caregiver Child Relationship; Caregivers; Certification; Child Abuse; Child abuse & neglect; Child abuse prevention; Child Rearing; Child welfare; Childrearing practices; Children; Clinical trials; Dyads; Emotional abuse; Family therapy; Feasibility; High risk; Home based; Integrated care; Parent Child Relationship; Parent-Child Interaction Therapy; Parent-child relations; Parental stress; Parenting intervention; Parenting skills; Parents & parenting; Randomized Controlled Trials; Resistance (Psychology); Risk; Skills; Therapists; Training; Welfare services; Child abuse prevention; Parenting intervention; Parent-Child Interaction Therapy
• ISSN: 0145-2134; 1873-7757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105063

•Therapists at Child Welfare Services providers can complete the training requirements for Parent-Child Interaction Therapy.•Retaining families at-risk for abuse in voluntary services requires timely engagement.•Even a small dose of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy can improve positive parenting skills in at-risk families.•University-community partnerships provide a promising solution to sustaining evidence-based services in community-based Child Welfare Services settings. Despite evidence supporting Parent-Child Interaction Therapy’s (PCIT) effectiveness for maltreatment prevention, its integration in child welfare services (CWS) has been challenging. Using a pilot randomized controlled trial design, we evaluated the (1) feasibility of training therapists from CWS providers to implement home-based PCIT (2) feasibility of retaining parent-child dyads at-risk for child abuse in voluntary PCIT services, and (3) promise of PCIT for improving parenting skills. Between 2015–2017, 23 therapists from CWS providers and 55 caregiver-child dyads who were determined to be at moderate-to-high risk for physical and/or emotional abuse, remained in the same home, and were referred for voluntary parenting services following a child protective investigation participated. We trained 14 therapists in home-based PCIT and randomly assigned participating dyads to receive PCIT or services as usual (SAU). Dyads completed baseline and post-treatment assessments, including self-reported and observed parenting skills. All therapists successfully completed the PCIT training; none completed full certification requirements. Of all randomized dyads, 51 % completed at least one treatment session, and the mean number of treatment sessions was 10.83. Caregivers assigned to PCIT used more self-reported (d = .72) and observed (d = .59) positive parenting skills post-treatment than caregivers assigned to SAU. Negative, inconsistent, and punitive parenting strategies and parenting stress did not significantly differ between caregivers assigned to PCIT and SAU. Despite several challenges to feasibly implementing PCIT in community-based child welfare settings, even a small dose of PCIT improved positive parenting skills among at-risk parent-child dyads.