Reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength measurement protocol in older men

• Published in: The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences Vol. 60; no. 1; p. 114
• Main Authors: Symons, T Brock, Vandervoort, Anthony A, Rice, Charles L, Overend, Tom J, Marsh, Greg D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.01.2005
• Subjects: Aged; Clinical Protocols; Humans; Isometric Contraction; Male; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Physical Examination - methods; Reproducibility of Results; Torque
• ISSN: 1079-5006
• DOI: 10.1093/gerona/60.1.114

The purposes of the current study were (a) to determine the test-retest reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength testing protocol in older healthy men, and (b) to compare the outcomes of the reliability measures derived from averaged torque scores with those derived from a single peak torque score. In 19 men (mean age, 72 +/- 5 years), both lower limbs were assessed independently on 2 separate test days using the Biodex System 3 dynamometer. After completing a 5-minute warm-up, each man performed three submaximal knee extensions followed by five maximal contractions at 90 degrees /s (CON), 0 degrees /s (ISO), and -90 degrees /s (ECC). Average (best 3 of 5) and peak CON, ISO, and ECC torque, and CON work and CON power were determined. Peak CON work and CON power were recorded from the highest peak torque concentric contraction (HPTCC). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 were found to have good reliability. The typical error as a coefficient of variation ranged from 8% to 10% for averaged measures and from 8% to 17% for peak torque and HPTCC. The ratio limits of agreement for average and peak CON, ISO, and ECC torque ranged from 23% to 33% and from 40% to 54% for average CON and HPTCC work and power. The test-retest reliability of a single-session isokinetic and isometric strength testing protocol in this group of older healthy men displayed good relative reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.84); however, because the typical error as a coefficient of variation and ratio limits of agreement (absolute reliability) were large, single-session testing is not recommended.