A return of mental imagery: The pictorial theory of visual perspective-taking
•This review paper describes how mental imagery has been argued to assist in the process of visual perspective-taking.•We challenge this notion. It is the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process.•The so-called ‘perceptual simulation’ account of visual perspective-t...
Saved in:
Published in | Consciousness and cognition Vol. 102; p. 103352 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.07.2022
Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | •This review paper describes how mental imagery has been argued to assist in the process of visual perspective-taking.•We challenge this notion. It is the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process.•The so-called ‘perceptual simulation’ account of visual perspective-taking is not supported by the empirical evidence.
The pictorial theory of mental imagery was a central concern of cognitive science during the latter years of the last century. Proponents of the theory argued that images are reinterpreted by the same processes that act upon perceptual inputs. This idea has recently re-emerged within the context of visual perspective-taking. The perceptual simulation theory argues that an observer not only generates an image of what another individual sees but the image is used by the perceptual system in a bottom-up manner. Based on the assumption of Kosslyn and colleagues, we argue that a minimum requirement of a pictorial theory of visual perspective-taking is that observers must faithfully represent relative distance between different points of a scene as would be viewed from an alternative position. The available evidence does not however support this. We conclude that the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process is unwarranted. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1053-8100 1090-2376 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103352 |