A return of mental imagery: The pictorial theory of visual perspective-taking

•This review paper describes how mental imagery has been argued to assist in the process of visual perspective-taking.•We challenge this notion. It is the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process.•The so-called ‘perceptual simulation’ account of visual perspective-t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inConsciousness and cognition Vol. 102; p. 103352
Main Authors Cole, Geoff G., Samuel, Steven, Eacott, Madeline J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.07.2022
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•This review paper describes how mental imagery has been argued to assist in the process of visual perspective-taking.•We challenge this notion. It is the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process.•The so-called ‘perceptual simulation’ account of visual perspective-taking is not supported by the empirical evidence. The pictorial theory of mental imagery was a central concern of cognitive science during the latter years of the last century. Proponents of the theory argued that images are reinterpreted by the same processes that act upon perceptual inputs. This idea has recently re-emerged within the context of visual perspective-taking. The perceptual simulation theory argues that an observer not only generates an image of what another individual sees but the image is used by the perceptual system in a bottom-up manner. Based on the assumption of Kosslyn and colleagues, we argue that a minimum requirement of a pictorial theory of visual perspective-taking is that observers must faithfully represent relative distance between different points of a scene as would be viewed from an alternative position. The available evidence does not however support this. We conclude that the latest attempt to give mental imagery causal status in a cognitive process is unwarranted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1053-8100
1090-2376
DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2022.103352