Wild horses and the political ecology of nature restoration in the Missouri Ozarks

• Published in: Geoforum Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 200 - 211
• Main Author: Rikoon, J. Sanford
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2006
• Subjects: Animals; Disputes; Ecosystem management; Ecosystems; Environmentalism; Exotic species; Geography; Horses; Interest Groups; Land Use; Legislation; Missouri; National Park Service; National parks; Ozarks; Parks; Political Economy; Regional identity; Resource Management; Social construction of landscapes; U.S.A; Wild horses; USA, Missouri; Wild horses; Exotic species; National Park Service; Ecosystem management; Missouri; Ozarks; Social construction of landscapes
• ISSN: 0016-7185; 1872-9398
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.01.010

From 1990 to 1996, the National Park Service and residents living near the Ozark National Scenic Riverways in south-central Missouri clashed over the federal agency’s intention to remove 25–30 wild horses from the protected area. The struggle was carried out in various legal and legislative arenas, the media, and in community protests and meetings. The dispute ended only with Congressional approval of the 1996 Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act, which included an amendment ordering an end to any removal efforts. This article focuses on the contested social constructions of the horses themselves. To government scientists and managers, the animals represented a feral and exotic species with no legitimate place in agency-mandated ecosystem management and restoration scenarios. To many local members of the Missouri Wild Horse League, which contested the removal, the horses had critical historical and cultural importance as icons of regional identity, history and personal experience, and as core symbols of communities increasingly politically and economically marginalized. Local disputes with environmental groups and agencies concerned with Ozark ecosystem preservation and restoration have become more pronounced and numerous over the past two decades. This article approaches citizen opposition to environmental agendas not as an anti-environmental movement, but as a contemporary effort of marginalized groups to identify sources of economic, political, and social loss, and symbols of local identity and power. The wild horse issue reveals wider structural divides, and thus speaks to the question of which social groups shall have the power to impose their visions of the landscape and political economy.