Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: II. Qualitative findings from a study of uptake in South Wales

Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a cohort of 22 test applicants who requested Huntington's disease (HD) predictive testing in South Wales, and a random sample of 32 non‐requesters, drawn from the South Wales HD register. Apart from identifying differences between the groups, the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical genetics Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 489 - 496
Main Authors Binedell, Julia, Soldan, Jo R, Harper, Peter S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.1998
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a cohort of 22 test applicants who requested Huntington's disease (HD) predictive testing in South Wales, and a random sample of 32 non‐requesters, drawn from the South Wales HD register. Apart from identifying differences between the groups, the study afforded the opportunity to listen, at length, to at‐risk individuals' accounts of living at risk and their thoughts about predictive testing and genetic services. Emergent themes included difficulties in family communication and the uncertainties inherent in being at risk and undergoing testing. Important factors in decision making about testing were: moral imperatives to clarify one's genetic status; views about the controllability of the future; family attitudes and norms; and the impact of a test result on family members. At‐risk individuals' perceptions of the genetics service were that contact with the service would result in pressure to be tested and a need for test applicants to present a favourable view of coping capacities to secure testing. In addition, there was an expectation of ongoing contact with HD families at the initiative of the service providers. Implications of the findings for the way in which predictive testing services are structured and introduced to the at‐risk population are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:7BE58C0C3A5158710E4A88DB068AAC5AF02FD67D
ark:/67375/WNG-JG5LJSJX-3
ArticleID:CGE489
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9163
1399-0004
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb03769.x