Clinical usefulness of intrathecal antibody testing in acute Lyme neuroborreliosis

The aim of the study was to examine diagnostic sensitivity and temporal course of intrathecal Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibody production in acute Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). We recruited consecutive adult patients with LNB diagnosis based on strict selection criteria. Serum and cerebrospinal flu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of neurology Vol. 14; no. 8; pp. 873 - 876
Main Authors Ljøstad, U., Skarpaas, T., Mygland, Å.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of the study was to examine diagnostic sensitivity and temporal course of intrathecal Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibody production in acute Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). We recruited consecutive adult patients with LNB diagnosis based on strict selection criteria. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSFs) were obtained, and clinical examination was performed pre‐treatment, and 13 days and 4 months post‐treatment. Pre‐treatment positive Bb antibody index (AI) was detected in 34 of 43 (79%). All nine pre‐treatment Bb AI negative patients, and 26 of 34 pre‐treatment Bb AI positive patients reported symptom duration <6 weeks. Eight patients, all Bb AI positive, reported symptom duration of 6 weeks or longer. Consequently, pre‐treatment diagnostic sensitivity of Bb AI was 74% when symptom duration was <6 weeks, and 100% when 6 weeks or longer. Three patients converted from negative to positive Bb AI status post‐treatment. The six patients who were persistently Bb AI negative had lower CSF cell count and protein at presentation, when compared with the patients with positive Bb AI. In conclusion, the diagnostic sensitivity of Bb AI is suboptimal in acute early LNB. Repeated post‐treatment Bb AI testing, to confirm or reject LNB diagnosis, is unreliable, as the majority of initial Bb AI negative patients remained negative at follow‐up.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ENE1799
ark:/67375/WNG-7XNZR37W-5
istex:0E6B13D9EB69EB0E810B94C8E1545D7A334BF9EA
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1351-5101
1468-1331
1471-0552
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01799.x