Myocardial cooling and right ventricular function in patients with right coronary artery disease: antegrade vs. retrograde cardioplegia

• Published in: Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 287 - 296
• Main Authors: HONKONEN, E. L., KAUKINEN, L., PEHKONEN, E. J., KAUKINEN, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.1997; Blackwell
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Biological and medical sciences; Body Temperature; Cardiac Output; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Disease - physiopathology; Coronary Disease - surgery; Female; Heart Arrest, Induced - methods; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Myocardial protection; myocardial revascularization; right ventricular function; Stroke Volume; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the heart; Ventricular Function, Right; Ventricular Pressure; Human; Temperature; Cooling; Retrograde; Right ventricle performance; Cardiovascular disease; Cardioplegia; Route of administration; Coronary heart disease; Right coronary artery; Aortocoronary; Bypass; Anterograde; Myocardium; Hemodynamics; Protection; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0001-5172; 1399-6576
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04681.x

Background: Protection of the right ventricular (RV) myocardium during ischaemia in cardiac surgery is difficult, especially in patients with severe right coronary artery (RCA) disease. Retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia is thought to distribute uniformly, but doubts still remain as to its adequacy in RV preservation. This study evaluated distribution of antegrade vs. exclusively retrograde coronary sinus cold blood cardioplegia by assessing myocardial cooling and compared the effects on RV function. Methods: Fifty‐eight patients scheduled for elective coronary artery surgery ‐ 29 patients with significant RCA disease and another 29 with no significant RCA stenosis (controls) ‐ were randomised to receive either antegrade or retrograde cold blood cardioplegia through either aortic root or conventional self‐inflating coronary sinus catheter (RCA‐ante, RCA‐retro, C‐ante and C‐retro groups). RV function was assessed by fast‐response thermodilution. Myocardial temperatures were measured in the anterior and posterior wall of the right and left ventricle. Results: Cooling of the posterior wall of the RV was effective only in the control patients given antegrade cardioplegia (14.7°C), whereas in the other groups the lowest myocardial temperatures there remained above 20°C (RO.001). In patients with obstructed RCA both antegrade and retrograde cold cardioplegia led to uneven cooling of the myocardium. After cardiopulmonary bypass the RV ejection fraction (RVEF), RV stroke work index (RVSWI) and cardiac index (CI) were significantly reduced in the RCA‐retro group, and RVSWI and CI in the C‐retro group, too. Regression analysis showed an inverse relationship between the temperatures of the posterior walls of the ventricles and changes in the RVEF and CI. Conclusions: Retrograde and antegrade cardioplegia alone were not effective in reducing the temperature of the posterior wall of the RV in the patients with obstructed RCA, in whom with retrograde cardioplegia RV haemodynamics were impaired for 1 hour following bypass. Neither retrograde nor antegrade cardioplegia alone can be relied on to protect the posterior wall of the RV in the patients with obstructed RCA.