Plasticizing Aqueous Suspensions of Concentrated Alumina with Maltodextrin Sugar

Aqueous suspensions of submicrometer, 20 vol% Al2O3 powder exhibited a transition from strongly flocculated, thixotropic behavior to a low‐viscosity, Newtonian‐like state upon adding small amounts of maltodextrin (0.03 g of maltodextrin/(g of Al2O3)). These suspensions could be filter pressed to hig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Ceramic Society Vol. 82; no. 1; pp. 57 - 66
Main Authors Schilling, Christopher H., Bellman, Robert A., Smith, Rachelle M., Goel, Honey, Giesche, Herbert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Westerville, Ohio American Ceramics Society 01.01.1999
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aqueous suspensions of submicrometer, 20 vol% Al2O3 powder exhibited a transition from strongly flocculated, thixotropic behavior to a low‐viscosity, Newtonian‐like state upon adding small amounts of maltodextrin (0.03 g of maltodextrin/(g of Al2O3)). These suspensions could be filter pressed to highly dense (57%) and extrudable pastes only when prepared with maltodextrin. We analyzed the interaction of maltodextrin with Al2O3 powder surfaces and quantitatively measured the resulting claylike consolidation, rheological, and extrusion behaviors. Benbow extrusion parameters were comparable to, but higher than, those of kaolin at approximately the same packing density of 57 vol%. In contrast, Al2O3 filter cakes without maltodextrin at 57 vol% density were too stiff to be extruded. Measurements of rheological properties, acoustophoresis, electrophoresis, sorption isotherms, and diffuse reflectance Fourier infrared spectroscopy supported the hypothesis that sorbate‐mediated steric hindrance, rather than electrostatic, interparticle repulsion, is important to enhancing the consolidation and fluidity of maltodextrin–Al2O3 suspensions. Viscosity measurements on aqueous maltodextrin solutions indicated that free maltodextrin in solution does not improve suspension fluidity by decreasing the viscosity of the interparticle solution.
Bibliography:istex:448311FC8DA86737CDA387FED2E228FC2D32E557
ark:/67375/WNG-9DVF1L0M-X
ArticleID:JACE57
G. L. Messing—contributing editor
Ames Laboratory is operated by Iowa State University under the Contract No. W‐74005‐eng‐82 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Member American Ceramic Society.
ISSN:0002-7820
1551-2916
DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01723.x