Isolated Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair Can Achieve Successful Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

To report on clinical presentations and outcomes in patients who underwent an isolated endoscopic gluteus medius (GM) repair. We retrospectively reviewed and prospectively collected data on patients who underwent a primary isolated endoscopic GM repair. Patients were included if the following patien...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation Vol. 3; no. 6; pp. e1697 - e1704
Main Authors Meghpara, Mitchell B., Yelton, Mitchell J., Glein, Rachel M., Malik, Mohammad S., Rosinsky, Philip J., Shapira, Jacob, Maldonado, David R., Ankem, Hari K., Lall, Ajay C., Domb, Benjamin G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2021
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To report on clinical presentations and outcomes in patients who underwent an isolated endoscopic gluteus medius (GM) repair. We retrospectively reviewed and prospectively collected data on patients who underwent a primary isolated endoscopic GM repair. Patients were included if the following patient-reported outcome scores were obtained preoperatively and at minimum 2-year follow-up: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) score. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the mHHS, NAHS, and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Scale was uniquely calculated for this study. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures including hip arthroplasty and hip arthroscopy were excluded. A total of 26 hips met all inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 23 hips (88.5%) (22 patients) had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Nineteen hips had a partial-thickness GM tear; 17 (89.5%) were high-grade partial-thickness tears treated with a side-to-side repair through a transtendinous window. Four full-thickness tears with no retraction or fatty infiltration were able to be repaired endoscopically. The mHHS, NAHS, and VAS score all significantly improved (P < .05) from baseline: The mHHS improved from 55.9 to 75.4 (P = .005); the NAHS, from 58.8 to 79.2 (P = .003); and the VAS score, from 5.9 to 3.6 (P = .009). The MCID was calculated for the mHHS, NAHS, and Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Scale as 5.8, 7.1, and 11.0, respectively. Most patients achieved the MCID for all 3 patient-reported outcome scores. Appropriately selected patients without concomitant intra-articular hip pathology may achieve successful outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up after an isolated endoscopic GM repair. Most isolated endoscopic GM repairs were performed for partial-thickness GM tears. Level IV, case-series study.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2666-061X
2666-061X
DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.026