Illusory shape representation in the monkey inferior temporal cortex
Perceived boundaries without physical differences between shape and background are called illusory contours (ICs). ICs and real contours (RCs) activate the early processing stages of the macaque visual pathway and the occipitotemporal areas of the human visual system in a similar way. However, it is...
Saved in:
Published in | The European journal of neuroscience Vol. 25; no. 8; pp. 2558 - 2564 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.04.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Perceived boundaries without physical differences between shape and background are called illusory contours (ICs). ICs and real contours (RCs) activate the early processing stages of the macaque visual pathway and the occipitotemporal areas of the human visual system in a similar way. However, it is not known how these contours are processed further in the highest visual areas. We tested how the responses of inferior temporal cortical (IT) neurons of macaque monkeys change in relationship to figures with RCs or ICs. The same set of figures [coloured pictures, ICs and silhouettes (SILs)] was presented to awake, fixating rhesus monkeys while the single‐cell activity was recorded in the anterior part of the IT. Most of the neurons responsive to RCs were also responsive to the same shapes presented as ICs. The average net firing rates, however, were significantly lower for the illusory stimuli than for the stimuli in the RC conditions, and the latency of the responses was significantly longer for the ICs than for the RCs. The shape selectivity was found to be different for coloured stimuli and ICs, and similar for SILs and ICs, suggesting the invariance of selectivity to shapes having the same contour but lacking internal surface information. These results suggest different modes of processing of RCs and ICs in the IT, which might explain the differences in their perception. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-73NP0MV6-F ArticleID:EJN5494 istex:ACD6C590C7F9260DF0457D3883A5B93AE3F1F099 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0953-816X 1460-9568 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05494.x |