Evidence for the insufficient evaluation and undertreatment of chronic hepatitis B infection in a predominantly low-income and immigrant population

Background and Aim:  Many physicians remain unaware of contemporary treatments for chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection and do not treat their HBV‐infected patients or refer them for treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine the rates of laboratory evaluation and treatment of HBV infec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 369 - 375
Main Authors Jung, Chin W, Tan, Jennifer, Tan, Nelly, Kuo, Melissa N, Ashok, Ashwin, Eells, Samantha J, Miller, Loren G
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Melbourne, Australia Blackwell Publishing Asia 01.02.2010
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aim:  Many physicians remain unaware of contemporary treatments for chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection and do not treat their HBV‐infected patients or refer them for treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine the rates of laboratory evaluation and treatment of HBV infection in a predominantly low‐income and immigrant population. Methods:  We identified adult patients who tested positive for hepatitis B surface antigen between 1 January 1994 and 30 April 2006. We reviewed patients' medical records to determine two outcomes: (i) receipt of pretreatment evaluation of HBV infection; and (ii) receipt of HBV treatment. We then examined clinical and demographic factors associated with these outcomes. Results:  Twenty‐eight percent of 1231 HBV surface antigen‐positive patients received additional laboratory evaluation of their infection. In a multivariate analysis, receipt of a HBV evaluation was independently associated with (P < 0.05) female sex, longer duration of HBV infection, more visits to a gastroenterology clinic and less recent health‐care contact. Data on treatment were available for 56% of patients; among these, 16% received HBV treatment. In the multivariate analysis, receipt of HBV treatment was independently associated with (P < 0.05) HIV co‐infection, receipt of liver biopsy, testing for hepatitis B e antigen or HBV DNA, longer duration of HBV infection, more visits to a gastroenterology clinic and more recent health‐care contact. When excluding HIV‐infected patients, only 10% of patients received HBV treatment. Conclusions:  After the diagnosis of HBV infection, few patients in our population received laboratory evaluation to determine eligibility for HBV treatment. Furthermore, only a small percentage received HBV treatment. Further research needs to be done to validate these findings in other populations and understand barriers to receiving HBV treatment.
Bibliography:istex:83FB553B04444D85F42AAD604800DA6946DBFD3E
ArticleID:JGH6023
ark:/67375/WNG-CQ2R0778-4
Present address: UCI Medical Center, Irvine, California, USA.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06023.x